(800) 239-1103

I’m Michael DiVita — DRE #01372066 | NMLS #241655, DiVita Home Finance (DRE #01818285 | NMLS #323700), Tiburon, CA. I’ve been in California mortgage lending since 2000 and founded DiVita Home Finance in 2007. Most of the “impossible” situations people call me about have a path forward — here are the 10 I see most often. Call (800) 239-1103.

I’ve been closing California mortgages for 25 years. In that time, I’ve seen a lot of situations that borrowers — and sometimes their Realtors — were convinced were dead deals. Most of them weren’t.

Here are the 10 situations I see most often that look unsolvable and usually aren’t.

1. Self-Employed with Low Tax Return Income

This is by far the most common “impossible” situation I see. A business owner pulling $300,000–$600,000 through their company but showing $80,000–$150,000 of taxable income after legitimate deductions. Every conventional lender looks at the tax return and declines.

The solution is a bank statement program. These use 12–24 months of personal or business bank deposits — not tax returns — to calculate qualifying income. A borrower depositing $380,000 a year into their business account qualifies on that, not their Schedule C AGI. These programs exist specifically for this situation. I close them constantly in Marin County and across California.

2. SB 326 Non-Warrantable Condo

California’s balcony inspection law has flagged thousands of condo buildings. When a building has unfunded SB 326 deficiencies, pending inspections, or related litigation, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac won’t back the loan. Most banks follow that same guidance and decline.

Portfolio lenders and non-QM investors have reviewed the SB 326 landscape and are actively closing loans on affected buildings at 7.17–7.91%. The rate is higher than conventional — sometimes 0.50–1.00% more — but the deals close.

3. Leased Land in Palm Springs

About a third of Palm Springs sits on Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians tribal land. Fannie Mae and FHA have approved protocols for financing below the $806,500 conforming limit — that part is manageable. Above conforming, most jumbo lenders simply don’t have a leased land approval framework.

I have relationships with the specific wholesale investors who’ve done the work on Agua Caliente leases and will close jumbo purchases on them. If your Palm Springs property is on Indian land and you need a loan above $806,500, call me before you go under contract.

4. Foreign National Buyer (No U.S. Credit)

No SSN, no U.S. credit history, income in a foreign currency. Banks decline. Foreign national mortgage programs exist specifically for this borrower — they use an international credit report, foreign income documentation, and typically require 25–40% down. Canadian buyers in Palm Springs, European buyers in LA and Napa, Asian tech executives in the Bay Area. I close these regularly.

5. Post-Bankruptcy or Foreclosure

Conventional loans typically require 4–7 years after a bankruptcy or foreclosure. Non-QM lenders work with 2–3 year seasoning on Chapter 7 bankruptcies and 3–4 years on foreclosures, with stronger compensating factors at the shorter timelines. The story matters — a medical bankruptcy or COVID-era short sale reads completely differently to a non-QM underwriter than a pattern of financial mismanagement.

6. High Debt-to-Income Ratio

Conventional loans cap DTI at 43–50%. In California, where property taxes are high and many buyers have existing investment loans, student debt, and business liabilities, DTI above 50% isn’t unusual. Non-QM programs go to 55% DTI, and some go higher with strong compensating factors like substantial reserves or lower LTV.

7. Retiree with Investment Income Only

A retired buyer with $3M in a Schwab account and $45,000/year in Social Security. Conventional income calculation doesn’t work well here. Asset depletion programs divide liquid assets by the remaining loan term to impute monthly income. $3M divided by 360 months = $8,333/month of imputed income. Combined with Social Security, that supports a significant mortgage. I see this situation constantly in Marin County, Palm Springs, and the wine country.

8. DSCR Investment Property (No Personal Income Required)

A real estate investor who doesn’t want to document personal income — or whose personal tax returns won’t support another investment loan — can qualify on the property’s rental income instead. DSCR programs require that the property’s gross rent covers the monthly payment (typically 1.0–1.25x coverage ratio). No W-2s, no tax returns, no personal income documentation. These are how real estate investors scale in California without hitting conventional loan limits.

9. Multiple Properties / Portfolio Investor

Conventional loans limit financed properties to 10. Beyond that, you’re in portfolio or DSCR territory. Even below 10, having multiple financed properties raises DTI to levels that kill new conventional approvals. Portfolio lenders and non-QM investors handle multi-property borrowers regularly — the underwriting just looks at the overall picture rather than a conventional checklist.

10. Income from Multiple Unusual Sources

1099 income from multiple clients, K-1 income from a partnership, RSU vesting schedules, combination of base salary plus commission plus rental income plus business distributions. Conventional underwriting handles simple income well. Complex mixed-source income often requires a lender who can look at the full picture and apply judgment rather than running a model.

What Actually Makes a Deal Unworkable

There are situations I genuinely can’t solve: no verifiable income, no assets, no equity, recent pattern of delinquency with no explanation. Those aren’t just hard — they’re unfinanceable under any program that isn’t predatory.

But the list above? Those aren’t dead deals. They’re just not conventional deals. There’s a difference, and it matters. If you’ve been told your situation is impossible, tell me what the problem is. I’ll tell you honestly within 24 hours whether I’ve seen it before and whether there’s a path forward.


Talk to Michael Directly

DiVita Home Finance | Tiburon, CA | In lending since 2000, founded DiVita Home Finance in 2007. Michael DiVita DRE #01372066 | NMLS #241655. Company DRE #01818285 | NMLS #323700.

📞 (800) 239-1103

💬 Text: (310) 849-9124

Start Your Application